Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

2 participants
1873 discussions

FEC endorses selling of email addresses
by Matthew Wilson 02 Jun '05

02 Jun '05

Let's try that link again... http://chicagotribune.com/technology/chi-0505310158may31,1,5465703.story > "Draft rules from the Federal Election Commission, which enforces > campaign finance laws, would require that paid political > advertisements > on the Internet declare who funded the ad, as television spots do. > Similar disclaimers would be placed on political Web sites, as well as > on e-mails sent to people on purchased lists containing more than 500 > addresses."

1 0

FEC endorses selling of email addresses
by Matthew Wilson 02 Jun '05

02 Jun '05

I thought you (fellow) anti-spam folks would get a kick out of this... "Draft rules from the Federal Election Commission, which enforces campaign finance laws, would require that paid political advertisements on the Internet declare who funded the ad, as television spots do. Similar disclaimers would be placed on political Web sites, as well as on e-mails sent to people on purchased lists containing more than 500 addresses." from http://www.chicagotribune.com/technology/chi-0505310158may31,1,5465703.s tory Matthew Wilson, MCSE (2003), MCSA-Messaging Network Administrator matthew(a)boomer.com Boomer Consulting, Inc. 610 Humboldt Manhattan, KS 66502 http://www.boomer.com <http://www.boomer.com/> 1-888-266-6375 x 17

1 0

PayPal Joe-job
by Joe Wein 02 Jun '05

02 Jun '05

Since I list a lot of fake company domains in money-forwarding scams on my website (a data source of JP on multi.surbl.org), I seem to have offended a few people. Yesterday someone made 4 PayPal payments to my account, two from the US, one from France and one from Australia. PayPal caught it or was alerted and reversed all transfers, as well as suspending my account pending investigation. In the last two days I also received "fan mail" from Nigeria and South Africa regarding some anti-419 data that I publish. Just wanted to let you guys know. I take it as a sign that the scammers are feeling some pain, which is good :-) Joe Wein -- joewein.de LLC 6-30 Sumiyoshidai, Aoba-ku Yokohama, 227-0035, Japan E-Mail: joewein(a)pobox.com WWW: http://www.joewein.de

3 2

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: embedded image spams
by Bjurstrom, Eric 01 Jun '05

01 Jun '05

I believe this is the second incarnation I have seen of the email, used to be a different domain. Its quite annoying as the previous one was in the various surbl lists, but due to the obfuscation was not getting flagged. -----Original Message----- From: List Mail User [mailto:track@plectere.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:28 PM To: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org Cc: track(a)plectere.com Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: embedded image spams thouljthou1. com - multitrade group, now omnicorporation New name and address though. Paul Shupak track(a)plectere.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

[way off-topic] Email Cartoon
by Kevin A. McGrail 01 Jun '05

01 Jun '05

Perhaps you've seen, perhaps you haven't but here is some SPAM humor to pass the time. Sorry if you aren't interested but as my office has taken to referring to me as a SPAM junkie, I totally related to this cartoon and thought some of the others would too. WARNING: This cartoon could be considered offensive and should not be viewed by anyone. http://www.pccc.com/downloads/junk/cool/email_cartoon.mpg <shun>flames</shun> Regards, KAM

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: embedded image spams
by List Mail User 01 Jun '05

01 Jun '05

thouljthou1. com - multitrade group, now omnicorporation New name and address though. Paul Shupak track(a)plectere.com

1 0

Re: embedded image spams
by Sean Sowell 31 May '05

31 May '05

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1030, I wrote: >>> Yes, please, if you could mention the ones over the past couple >>> days we'll look into them. Some of the ones you mentioned >>> earlier are already blacklisted, so we'd like to analyze the >>> unlisted recent ones to see how we can list them sooner. >> By the way, just to sanity check things, these are the domains in >> message body URIs and not headers, right? I ask because it's >> somewhat unusual to have two sets of domains in a given spam, >> and SURBLs are meant to operate on message body URIs and not >> headers. > Yes, in the body only. Frequently, these things include an image of a text > disclaimer/opt-out notice at the bottom. Rolling over the image shows the > hyperlinked URI, but the text within the image itself shows a different > domain. OK, here is the updated list. Thanks again: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:22:12 -0700 dayepencilseof.com and myfreecomputer.net Sun, 29 May 2005 20:44:52 GMT yourexclusivesource.com and exclusivesforyou.com Sun, 29 May 2005 20:47:52 GMT airinsider.com and insideroffers.com Sun, 29 May 2005 22:49:59 GMT smartshoppings.com and shoppingsmarts.net Sun, 29 May 2005 22:49:59 GMT smartsclub.com and shoppingsmarts.net Sun, 29 May 2005 23:55:15 -0700 travelocityofhelp.com and consumersurveygroup.com Mon, 30 May 2005 02:06:55 -0700 planetandsunshine.com Mon, 30 May 2005 02:40:41 -0500 undershow.com 30 May 2005 09:49:13 -0400 farcommail.com Mon, 30 May 2005 08:09:57 -0700 travelocityofhelp.com and consumersurveygroup.com Mon, 30 May 2005 21:32:54 +0400 (MSD) eanum.biz Mon, 30 May 2005 10:09:21 -0700 clearcutsavings.com and nyclearcut.com Mon, 30 May 2005 20:47:06 GMT ccgpc.com Mon, 30 May 2005 21:17:05 GMT iasem.com and yourgiftcards.com Mon, 30 May 2005 14:11:10 -0500 undershow.com Mon, 30 May 2005 21:46:58 GMT prcmx.com Mon, 30 May 2005 23:22:10 GMT aiear.com Tue, 31 May 2005 05:56:39 +0400 (MSD) marketingtherightway.com Mon, 30 May 2005 19:41:12 -0700 padlernestedman.com and producttestpanel.com Mon, 30 May 2005 17:26:07 -0700 clrctsvg.com and tickle.com 31 May 2005 03:42:49 -0400 besaway.com and esioffers.com Tue, 31 May 2005 00:58:17 -0500 undershow.com Tue, 31 May 2005 01:40:10 -0700 datdir.com and emarketresearchgroup.com and rocketoffers.com Tue, 31 May 2005 08:44:20 +0000 (GMT) globalsucess.com and zzinc.info Tue, 31 May 2005 08:46:01 +0000 (GMT) globalsucess.com and zzinc.info Tue, 31 May 2005 06:16:26 -0700 datdir.com and fcdsoft.com and rocketoffers.com Tue, 31 May 2005 14:43:27 GMT ibringbargains.com and everyfreegift.com and bringonbargains.com Tue, 31 May 2005 14:45:26 GMT activeselfshopper.com and americanplatinum.com

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: embedded image spams
by Bjurstrom, Eric 31 May '05

31 May '05

pardon me if this has already been posted, but I am getting some embedded ones through that appear to take advantage of some IE "features" <font></font><A href="ht tp:/ /qeepluq.com&ljeabfhtqemxctry4ts73e%2E tho uljth ou1%2Ecom/"> If I have firefox up, this link goes nowhere. IE will actually turn the %2E to a "." and load it up. I have both the exim perl plugin by erik mugele and spamassassin plugin and neither catch it. -----Original Message----- From: Sean Sowell [mailto:sean@twin-dad.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:31 PM To: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: embedded image spams On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 0300, Jeff C. wrote: >> Yes, please, if you could mention the ones over the past couple >> days we'll look into them. Some of the ones you mentioned >> earlier are already blacklisted, so we'd like to analyze the >> unlisted recent ones to see how we can list them sooner. > By the way, just to sanity check things, these are the domains in > message body URIs and not headers, right? I ask because it's > somewhat unusual to have two sets of domains in a given spam, > and SURBLs are meant to operate on message body URIs and not > headers. Yes, in the body only. Frequently, these things include an image of a text disclaimer/opt-out notice at the bottom. Rolling over the image shows the hyperlinked URI, but the text within the image itself shows a different domain. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: embedded image spams
by Sean Sowell 31 May '05

31 May '05

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 0300, Jeff C. wrote: >> Yes, please, if you could mention the ones over the past couple >> days we'll look into them. Some of the ones you mentioned >> earlier are already blacklisted, so we'd like to analyze the >> unlisted recent ones to see how we can list them sooner. > By the way, just to sanity check things, these are the domains in > message body URIs and not headers, right? I ask because it's > somewhat unusual to have two sets of domains in a given spam, > and SURBLs are meant to operate on message body URIs and not > headers. Yes, in the body only. Frequently, these things include an image of a text disclaimer/opt-out notice at the bottom. Rolling over the image shows the hyperlinked URI, but the text within the image itself shows a different domain.

1 0

RE: Blogger attacks SURBL
by Chris Santerre 31 May '05

31 May '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 8:57 PM >To: SURBL Discuss; SpamAssassin Users >Subject: Blogger attacks SURBL > > >Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention. > >This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as >thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us >straighten him out, gently: > >http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_blogs/ > >I gave it my shot. > >Jeff C. Thanks for the link. I shot him a 'nice' reply. Some people just don't understand. --Chris (Yeah I thought abuot listing his site just for fun ;)

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss